People with aphasia can have trouble speaking, reading, or understanding others. There are two different categories of aphasia nonfluent and fluent , and each has several types associated with it. The treatment of aphasia involves speech-language therapy, which helps develop improved communication.
Support from friends, family, or a support group can also greatly help someone with aphasia on their road to recovery. Global aphasia is the most severe type of aphasia. It affects all your language skills. Recovery is a slow process, but many people make significant…. Speech therapy is a treatment for speech disorders. Both children and adults may benefits from speech therapy. During speech therapy you may perform…. Dysphasia is a condition that affects your ability to produce and understand spoken language.
Language disorder, formerly known as mixed receptive-expressive language disorder, is common in young children. Here are the signs and treatment….
Body language is just as important as verbal communication, but it's often harder to understand. Learn the basics of how to read it and make the most…. Learn more. The vagus nerve is the longest of the 12 cranial nerves. Here, learn about its anatomy, functions, and the kinds of health problems that can occur.
Muscle twitching refers to small muscle contractions in the body. Learn more about the causes and treatment here. Health Conditions Discover Plan Connect. How to Identify the Different Types of Aphasia.
Medically reviewed by Heidi Moawad, M. Types of aphasia chart Treatments How to cope How loved ones can help Takeaway Aphasia is a condition that affects language.
People who have aphasia can have trouble with things like speaking, reading, or listening. Types of aphasia chart. However, speech is difficult and requires great effort. Nonfluent global aphasia This is the most severe aphasia. You may use short phrases, have a delay in response time, and frequently repeat things. Determinants of quality of life in Brazilian stroke survivors.
J Neurol Sci. Domains and determinants of quality of life after stroke caused by brain infarction. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
Among the factors that influence the QOL, we can mention age, low educational level, mobility difficulties, depression, difficulties in social roles, and language changes 22 Long-term outcome in the North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence study: predictors of quality of life at 5 years after stroke. Factors related to quality of life of stroke survivors. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. The sample was mostly formed by adult men, and with independence level varying from little to moderate mRs.
Studies on post-stroke QOL with Brazilian patients show greater incidence for men, with mean age slightly above those of our study, much shorter stroke period, and level of independence compatible with our research 2 2.
Tubone MQ. In contrast, international studies on post-stroke QOL with aphasics, do not corroborate this difference between genders, presenting higher incidence in women, and mean age 60 and above 23 Quality of life and aphasia: multicentric standardization of a questionnaire. Eura Medicophys. It is important to consider that there are relevant differences between the study samples, what can explain the results.
Our study, for instance, includes few subjects with heterogeneous clinic characteristics. As for the SS-QOL, though the NF aphasic group presents an average score lower than the value found for the F aphasic group, indicating lower QOL, there was no significant statistic difference between the groups. Such values are similar to results of other studies with post-stroke Brazilian samples 9 9.
However, these studies made use of a population comprising aphasics and non-aphasics. Research done with another QOL tool comparing fluent and non-fluent aphasics showed that fluent aphasics presented a better QOL score 26 Moreover, the literature in this area reports that the severity of the aphasia is one of the principal predictors to decrease the QOL post-stroke 23 Finding a focus for quality of life with aphasia: social and emotional health, a psychocological well-being.
Clinical determinants of long-term quality of life after stroke. Age Aging. We did not find comparative studies of these two groups of aphasics using the same QOL questionnaire. Nevertheless, a study with another instrument showed that the domains of communication, physical and psychosocial aspects were different between F and NF aphasics, and that the NF aphasics showed lower scores in these domains 26 The current study demonstrated that the domains most affected by stroke were language, social roles, and thinking in the NF aphasics group, and personality, social roles, and thinking in the F aphasics group.
These results partly coincide with the findings in Brazilian research. Some authors 2 2. It is worth emphasizing the difference between the sample of our study, using only aphasics, and that of those authors, which use subjects who had a stroke episode but did not present aphasia as a sequel. An international study shows that the most affected domains by a lesional episode, in aphasic and non-aphasic populations, were upper extremity functional, social roles, and language 10 The literature shows a close relation between effectiveness of communication, social well-being, and psychological comfort of the aphasic 15 It is also clear in the studies that the aphasic has a higher number of depression symptoms, difficulties in performing daily activities, and higher level of dependence 15 Hilari K.
The impact of stroke: are people with aphasia different to those without? Disabil Rehabil. Ross K, Wertz R. Quality of life with and without aphasia. In the final subscale of the questionnaire, the subjects compare each domains in the present days and before the stroke, and they all evaluate that their QOL worsened after the lesional episode. However, other studies 9 9. This difference can be explained by the reduced size of the sample in our study, and also, because it refers to a population of aphasics only.
Such findings coincide with the literature already mentioned, in which the aspects related to both communication and physical aspects were also different between F and NF aphasics 26 Another study points out this correlation by showing that people who have worse functioning conditions have lower QOL 20 It also shows that individuals with better level of functioning and communication condition have less social restrictions, higher QOL, and better emotional health 27 The literature in the area mentions the role of AAC as a facilitator of the oral and discursive production in NF aphasics, promoting changes in this group social relations 11 Our study shows the differences and the impact of aphasia in the QOL of the groups studied, indicating that non-fluent aphasics, with greater difficulty in communication, have lower QOL.
Additionally, there is a relation between language, psychosocial factors, and the functioning of individuals, as evidenced in the SS-QOL domains. Also, the results indicate the AAC resources as a possibility of greater participation of the aphasic in communicative situations, being an auxiliary language resource, and able to favor changes in the QOL of this population. Abrir menu Brasil. Audiology - Communication Research. Home What is stroke? Diagnosis to discharge Childhood stroke Living with stroke After hospital discharge Effects of stroke Aphasia and communication Fatigue and tiredness Stroke publications Know your risk Are you at risk of stroke?
Types of aphasia. On this page: Broca's aphasia non-fluent aphasia Wernicke's aphasia fluent aphasia Anomic aphasia Primary progressive aphasia PPA There are several different types of aphasia, which affect people in different ways.
Broca's aphasia non-fluent aphasia. The features of Broca's aphasia are: Severely reduced speech, often limited to short utterances of less than four words. Limited vocabulary. Clumsy formation of sounds.
Difficulty writing but the ability to read and understand speech. Wernicke's aphasia fluent aphasia. The features of Wernicke's aphasia are: Impaired reading and writing.
0コメント